SUCCESS METRICS
Baltimore City
2021-2022 SCHOOL YEAR
GOAL 1
Increase STEM literacy, curiosity, and identity in youth from historically under-resourced communities.
GOAL 2
Increase the capacity of schools and community organizations to implement high-quality, informal STEM learning experiences in historically under-resourced communities.
GOAL 1
Increase STEM literacy, curiosity, and identity in youth from historically under-
resourced communities.
How much did we do?
140
Number of Activities and Events
1690
Number of Youth Served
924
Unique youth served
5
Number of youth organizations LETS GO partnered with to deliver services
22
Number of program sites
How well did we do it?
18%
Average % growth in STEM knowledge indicated by content assessments
263
Number of students indicating STEM knowledge mastery in content assessments
45%
% students showing mastery of STEM knowledge
83%
% partners VERY satisfied with LETS GO planning and execution
Is anyone better off?
81%
% of students who report positive change for STEM engagement
64%
% of students who report positive change for STEM identity (4th grade and above)
65%
% of students who report positive change for STEM curiosity (4th grade and above)
81%
% of students who report positive change for STEM career interest (6th grade and above)
GOAL 2
Increase the capacity of schools and community organizations to implement high-quality, informal STEM learning experiences in historically under-resourced communities.
How much did we do?
52
Number of STEM instructor training workshops for partner staff/instructors
211
Number of STEM instructor training workshop participants/headcount
105
Number of unique STEM instructor training workshop participants
How well did we do it?
92%
% instructors trained STRONGLY agreed that training content was useful and relevant (Workshop Training Evaluation)
92%
% of instructors trained STRONGLY agreed that the training met their expectations (Workshop Training Evaluation)
92%
% of instructors trained STRONGLY agreed that the training met their expectations (Workshop Training Evaluation)
92%
% of instructors trained STRONGLY agreed that they knew they could reach out to LETS GO for support as they brought STEM to their classrooms (Workshop Training Evaluation)
Is anyone better off?
81%
% of instructors trained STRONGLY agreed that they were competent to teach students about the Engineering Design process and/or the Scientific Method (Workshop Training Evaluation)
75%
% of instructors trained STRONGLY agreed that they could deliver the STEM content taught in the training (Workshop Training Evaluation)
77%
% of instructors trained STRONGLY agreed that they were able to engage students in STEM practices (Workshop Training Evaluation)